Wednesday, 11 February 2015

Forster v Rose Revisited

Re yesterday's post on Bill Forster v Nathan Rose - Arthur Pomeroy felt there should be some analysis attached to the interesting position on move 27, so I have added that here. The rest of the annotation is Nathan's though.
Bill has also threatened to give his own version of events on the website, so watch out for that.

No comments:

Post a Comment